Between RCM and PAMP Fortuna, which one would you personally prefer?

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Between RCM (available on Costco Canada) and PAMP Fortuna bars (available on Costco Canada), Both currently on sale by Costco, and I’m curious to which one is more popular. While Fortuna bars tend to have premiums around $10 higher than RCM bars, this price difference is relatively small, making them quite comparable. If both bars had the same premiums, which one would you prefer to have?

PAMP stands as a top-tier choice for precious metal enthusiasts, often regarded as the gold standard in the world of bullion. On the other hand, RCM occupies a “tier 2” position, alongside Valcambi, but it’s typically favored over Valcambi. In fact, when it comes to PAMP versus RCM, many prefer PAMP. This preference is often linked to personal taste, with some considering PAMP more suitable for gold, while RCM aligns better with silver. It’s important to note that these preferences are personal and can be influenced by various factors.

There are some reasons why PAMP is often favored.

RCM bars do enjoy popularity and carry a slight premium over most other contemporary bars. On the other hand, PAMP Fortuna bars are also well-received, readily available, and typically priced at an average level. Moreover, some collectors may appreciate the higher quality of PAMP’s designs, which are often seen as more artistic. PAMP, in particular, is considered the gold standard when it comes to bars and assaying. This preference for high-quality mints like PAMP and RCM results in a higher premium, reflecting the extra cost over the spot price that buyers are willing to pay for these trusted products compared to bullion from regular mints.

However, the differentiation becomes more critical when comparing RCM/PAMP to lesser-known companies that manufacture and market their own bullion. In such cases, the reputation and recognition of the minting source come into play. RCM and PAMP bars are easier to sell due to their widespread recognition among bullion stackers, whereas bars from less-known companies may face challenges in finding buyers.

Royal Mint Gold Bars Vs Pamp Gold Bars!

Packaging for both bars is in hard, durable acrylic blister cards with a transparent center. However, PAMP’s packaging includes a scannable code for authenticity verification, which RM lacks. In terms of gold quality, both mints have outstanding reputations, but there are noticeable differences. RM’s gold may have rougher exterior edges, while PAMP’s gold is meticulously polished, providing a smoother finish and potentially giving PAMP an edge in overall quality.

Regarding pricing, both RM and PAMP command higher prices due to their exceptional quality, resulting in higher premiums. Price comparison between the two depends on your location. In the UK, RM may be slightly cheaper, but abroad, PAMP could be the more affordable option. Availability varies by region, but both are generally accessible through reputable bullion dealers. PAMP may be slightly harder to obtain in the UK.

When discussing reputable mints like RCM or PAMP, the distinction becomes less significant. Both are renowned for producing high-quality bullion items that not only look appealing but are also challenging to counterfeit. The choice between the two often comes down to individual opinion and specific collector or investor preferences.

VERISCAN’s advanced scanning technology

The PAMP Veriscan App is a valuable tool for individuals seeking to verify the authenticity of their precious metal bars, particularly those produced by Pamp’s refinery. This app works by comparing the surface features and unique characteristics of a scanned bar, originally recorded at Pamp’s refinery, with the physical bar presented to the phone’s camera. This comparison allows users to determine if the bar they have matches the one that left Pamp’s refinery. While the app does not assess the metal content, such as gold purity, it serves as a reliable means to visually confirm the authenticity of the bar and detect any notable discrepancies, making it a valuable resource for those concerned about counterfeit or altered bars in the market.

I’m not entirely certain about that, but it appears that the accuracy of Veriscan may vary between individual bars, especially because counterfeit attempts often fail to replicate the intricate reliefs accurately. I’m basing this on the information shared in PAMP’s YouTube video about Veriscan. On the other hand, the security of Canadian Maples is reinforced by government oversight, which enables the implementation of robust anti-counterfeiting measures. Despite my reservations about government-issued bullion, I prefer Valcambi Combibars due to their divisibility, breaking down into one-gram bars that are challenging to counterfeit and easy to verify for gold content. I concur that government bullion offers peace of mind, widespread recognition, and fluidity in the market.

Valcambi Combibars are undoubtedly impressive, although the premium can be a bit hard to swallow. I was contemplating the acquisition of one of the Royal Canadian Mint silver “combibars.” Notably, the Veriscan technology is bar-specific, relying on a match with what PAMP scanned when the bar was manufactured. Each bullion piece possesses microscopic differences, further details of which can be found on the PAMP website. The Royal Canadian Mint employs a similar technology. The key difference is that verifying a Gold Maple requires access to a specific machine, whereas PAMP Veriscan bullions can be authenticated with the convenience of an app if you own an iPhone. It’s essential to clarify that an app cannot determine the authenticity of gold itself, regardless of the verification method.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




  1. I’m working with a budget of less than 4K and looking for a 1926-D double eagle. I’ve heard that it’s…

  2. SD Bullion has been my go-to online bullion dealer, and my overall experience has been positive with a few noteworthy…

© 2024. Made with Twentig.